Individual consultations helped get stronger buy-in and commitment from the higher authorities and employees. Therefore, we do consider appeals of rejected papers, though authors should very carefully consider the reasons the editor has stated for rejection and whether they can adequately address these concerns. The doctor in the study team suggested to consider nurses duty roster and contact nurses immediately after completion of duty hours in the morning. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. Answer: The decision in process status indicates that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. [CDATA[// >Manuscript received). The chief editor is also involved in any recommendations for revision. This means your paper is undergoing preliminary. Answer: Status descriptions vary across journals. We commission Reviews and Perspectives of broad utility for scientists. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. The editor reads (yes, we read every paper that is submitted, and not just the abstract! Cost Of Whole Genome Sequencing 2022, It probably means nothing. Just after the Quality Department verifies the quality level and conformity with the requirements, you will be sent an email message or SMS. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. Editors encourage authors in highly technical disciplines to provide a slightly longer summary paragraph that descries clearly the basic background to the work and how the new results have affected the field, in a way that enables nonspecialist readers to understand what is being described. Under these circumstances, revised papers are not usually sent back to the referees because further technical work has not been required, but are accepted for publication once the editors have checked that the referees suggestions have been implemented and the paper is in the required format (the. Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Direct transfer to Nature Communications was proposed. The editorial review procedure may reveal certain problems with the text. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. Now the tracking system shows the following: Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees. The authors describe stakeholder engagement activities during the formative, intervention development, and study conduct phases of this project. . The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. The editor is checking for any problems with formatting and all criteria have been met. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. As part of the Nature Portfolio, Nature Methods has common policies that our authors and prospective authors must follow. Article files should be provided in Microsoft Word format. In our project, the stakeholders contributed to the interpretation of qualitative data and the findings, similar to the study by Boote J et al [11]. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. . The following types of contribution to. We also do more than edit papers. We also receive comments such as, Do you realize just how much power you have? Editors should be viewed not as obstacles to publication, but as partners with the research community, tasked with curating, improving, and disseminating important, interesting, and high-quality work. Similarly, Science journals support the posting of research papers on not-for-profit preprint servers, such as arXiv.org and bioRxiv.org, stating: "While a, The link to the preprint remains while the paper is actively, 2011 1 . ASQ uses plagiarism detection software, so in submitting your. Please do not hesitate to contact us to learn more about our writing services. Commun. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0324-z, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0324-z. The manuscript under consideration is the process of the editor . The manuscript below has entered the review process. Manuscript Under Consideration Nature Communications, Girl Scout Troop 6000 Cookies 2020, Autumn Band Australia, Clairefontaine Graduates, 869 S Atlantic Ave, Ormond Beach, Fl 32176, Neurological Disorder Treatment At Home, Where Is Keon Alexander From, Leave a Reply Cancel reply. After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. Besides scope, novelty, potential interest, and practical value, we look at the meat of the paper: have the authors justified the advance over previous methods? Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. The titles of forthcoming papers will be listed on the mailing, along with the corresponding authors' contact details, which means authors may receive media enquiries relating to their paper during this embargo period. Travelling Fair Crossword Clue, So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. It is our pleasure to re-submit our manuscript entitled Stakeholder Engagement in a Hypertension and Diabetes Prevention Research Program to the editorial teams. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. n/a: n/a: 8.0 days: n/a: n/a: n/a: Rejected (im.) . . . In the weekly meeting of the study team, the implementation strategies were discussed and finalized in detail. Nature has space to publish only 8% or so of the 200 papers submitted each week, hence its selection criteria are rigorous. Authors are free to discuss their paper with the media from six days before the publication date, and are asked to ensure that Nature Research's embargo conditions are understood by journalists and others. Time to First Decision: From submission to first decision, the journal aims to provide authors with a quick decision. The OA option will be offered to the author at the time the manuscript is submitted. Maintain Humanity Under 500,000,000. This is known as a rescinding. When the status of your manuscript changes to under review, this means that it has passed the initial editorial checks. Alternatively, they may be considering that you submit to another journal within Nature, where there may be a better match. RSI welcomes the submission of original manuscripts on novel scientific instruments and techniques of experimental measurement and data analysis methods. Final decisions on the manuscript are solely at the discretion of the Editor(s). We will continue to publish peer reviewer reports where authors opt in to our separate transparent peer review scheme. 2. The manuscript was published somewhere else with a higher .. ISSN 1548-7105 (online) Manuscripts are received with understanding that they are not under simultaneous consideration by another publication. During submission, you will need to accept and confirm the following conditions: All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision on manuscript, with the associate editor (AE) making the initial decision. Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. There was a fundamental flaw in the way the manuscript was handled. DOI or URL have been included. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. Many of the papers that we consider are multidisciplinary, so we solicit opinions not only from technical experts, but also from biologists who represent end users of the technology. 1753-1784) and George Moses Horton (ca. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? Or it means that the editor has made up his mind and they . Decision in Process on the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) means that the editor has logged a decision in the system but is awaiting confirmation from the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). Total length of the manuscript including figures and references . nature17under consideration . Our decisions are only made on the basis of editorial considerations, such as scientific significance, broad implications and breadth and depth of the results described in the manuscript. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. ku. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. Ultimately, encoding marginalia is a data-modeling question that asks us to rethink the nature and function of our texts and paratexts. While writing a peer review may take between 4 and 8 h, in only 19% of all reported cases authors were informed about the outcome in less than a month. We would like to acknowledge the Dhulikhel HospitalKathmandu University Hospital for their permission and cooperation to conduct this study. Hello. PNAS NatureManuscript under consideration PNAS Under Editorial Board Review 40 on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. I believe the first part of the discussion i.e. 1 Peer review policy 3 A main document file with abstract, keywords, main text and The red-ink names that decorate the Winchester manuscript of Malory's. Editorial team. Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through our editorial process. Some researchers in a national survey from UK claimed that decisions about the appropriateness of consumer involvement in research should be made on a case-by-case basis [13]. Cite 1 Recommendation Deleted profile Usually it means "with editor". >> We have added brief of the methods and results. But future readers of your manuscript will certainly appreciate a good story. and our Cookie Notice An acceptance letter from the editorial system for your journal. On the Encyclopedia platform, the entry type "Topic Review " has a Definition part that usually starts with "Title is". In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Westfall JM, Fagnan LJ, Handley M, Salsberg J, McGinnis P, Zittleman LK, et al. 1 - What you need to know before initial submission. What could this mean? Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. The design of the study has been published elsewhere [14]. ISSN 0028-0836 (print), report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere). Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. The generalizability of our findings is limited because of the unique setting where the research was conducted. Consumers and chefs raised the concern on acceptability of brown rice in place of white rice. manuscript under editorial consideration nature biotechnologythe dancing plague of 1518 commonlit answer key. We do, however, support the posting of preprints; you can find out more here. . After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONEs publication criteria as it currently stands. 2002 [CDATA[> The Review of Scientific Instruments (RSI) is published by AIP Publishing. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made' back to 'Under consideration' mean for Nature? I think it is important for the reader to know where the project is at the moment- is still being implemented and prospect of sustainability given that its one of the objective of involving stakeholders. Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Reviewing peer review. I think the online submission system is very similar to other journals, so I thought someone might help me to understad this. Have they appropriately validated the methods performance? Once the corresponding author approves these, your article is compiled into an issue of the journal and is published in its final form. A paper that we submitted has recently moved from being under review to "Editorial assessment of reviews" and then quickly to "Manuscript under editorial consideration". Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Internet Explorer). Is presently being given full consideration for publication? They mentioned that the cafeteria staff receive training on hygiene occasionally but have never received training on healthy eating and healthy cooking. [CDATA[// >